Skip to main content

If it wants to succeed, Iraq's protest movement needs to get organised

Demonstrations will not bear fruit unless authentic political currents emerge from the heart of the protests
Iraqi demonstrators march to mark the first anniversary of the anti-government protests in Baghdad on 1 October (Reuters)

On 1 October, the Iraqi people returned to their protest sites to commemorate the first anniversary of the largest popular movement in Iraq’s modern history. The movement transcended local politics and entered the realm of the US-Iran conflict.

A year ago, calls for protests in Baghdad began to appear on social media, but they initially garnered little reaction from the people. Observers and researchers predicted that these appeals would result in, at most, a two-hour protest in Tahrir Square, before petering out. Even the government was not prepared for what happened next.

The protests have not achieved any 'goal' - nor will they, as the movement was not launched with clear goals in mind

The protests spread quickly, as scores of demonstrators began to appear in Baghdad’s main squares. Clashes broke out with security forces. At the time, protesters were lifting apolitical banners and slogans focused on services, job opportunities, accountability for corruption and the state’s arbitrary demolition of shops. 

The government’s violent response, however, pushed protesters to demand reforms of the political system, with some calling for its downfall, along with a “fair” elections law and an end to political factions.

And yet, beyond Baghdad, the rallies spread across Iraq’s southern and central governorates. The death toll reached 560 people, according to Mustafa al-Kadhimi’s government, while thousands more were wounded. Authorities arrested some 2,800 protesters.

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked


The Iraqi people were not expecting to witness such protests, at least not for the next decade. Their experience with the 2008-2011 protests, as well as the 2015 protests that I helped to lead, was one of disappointment and hijacking by political parties and activists. This caused people to lose their hopes of channeling protest calls on social media into popular anger on the streets. 

Like any other political system that deals with its people in an obscure and non-transparent fashion, the Iraqi political establishment had no choice but to point the finger at other countries, accusing them of supporting activists to “destabilise” the country. But the incentives for protest and anger are deeply rooted in Iraq.

No clear goals

A year since their inception, however, the protests have not achieved any “goal” - nor will they, as the movement was not launched with clear goals in mind. It was essentially protest for the sake of protest. Demonstrators did have a broad list of demands, but they were unclear and were not presented to the government. 

This ultimately weakened the protest movement. Street protests were characterised by disparate demands in each protest square, until violence erupted - and then the demands transformed into calls for the overthrow of the government of Adil Abdul-Mahdi. These calls went unheeded until Iraq’s top Shia leader, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, called for a change in leadership; Abdul-Mahdi stepped down last November.

Iraqi anti-government protesters demonstrate in Basra in November 2019 (AFP)
Iraqi anti-government protesters demonstrate in Basra in November 2019 (AFP)

The protests lacked political awareness, with many broaching unrealistic demands. Calls to end political parties in Iraq, for example, would take the country back to a dictatorship.

Some gains were made, as protesters disrupted the Iraqi political system, which is chained by political and sectarian quotas. But this disorder is not enough; without tangible changes on the ground, the blood of protesters will have been spilled in vain. 

Iraqi political parties are now trying to convince protesters that the Kadhimi government represents them, even though it has failed to protect activists from killings and abductions.

On the contrary, under the Kadhimi government there has been an increase in attacks on activists, including the assassination of researcher Hisham al-Hashemi, which appeared to be a signal from armed groups to Kadhimi that they can target those in his inner circle if he infringes upon their interests. 

US-Iran tensions

The US-Iran conflict has also had a significant impact on protests in Iraq. Iran’s anti-protest position was met by opposing forces from the US in defence of protesters, spurring increased attacks and incitement against protesters by Iranian government media and armed groups, which tried to violently suppress demonstrations. We saw that such attacks increased as the conflict between Washington and Tehran escalated. 

Sistani could be considered the shield that protected and supported the protests, declaring his support for them and urging the Abdul-Mahdi government to meet the movement’s demands. Sistani, who has also supported major protests in previous years, is essentially Iraq’s buffer against the expansion of the Iranian project; without him, the crackdown against demonstrators would surely have been even more extreme.

Iraq 2020: What will happen to the protest movement?
Read More »

Sistani attempted to get closer to protesters, even though they let him down in 2015 by handing protests over to the Sadrist movement, according to a close associate who convened the first meeting between protesters and Sistani’s office in 2015, at which I was also present. 

Yet, despite Sistani’s support, some demonstrators blame him for maintaining what they see as a doveish position in the face of serious crimes committed against them. His close associate told me in December: “We do not move the street. Rather, the street moves us, and whenever the protesters escalate their rhetoric, we will escalate our speech.”

Kadhimi’s government, on the other hand, neither represents the protesters, nor governs the protests; rather, it is a government that came to power because of popular anger. On a practical level, it is not close to the street movement, and it has taken on more responsibilities than it should. As a transitional government facing specific tasks, it has acted with haste in proposing a government programme that tackles the most prominent and dangerous issues, including corruption and arms control.

Anti-Kadhimi sentiments

Kadhimi has tried to win over protesters by positioning himself against armed groups, but he has not succeeded. There is no positive relationship between Kadhimi and activists, who believe that as the former head of the Iraqi National Intelligence Service, Kadhimi let them down during past crackdowns. It is thus expected that they will shout slogans and lift banners against him in the coming days.

Iraq's popular movement cannot be relied upon unless it turns into real political action

Protesters are now preparing for 25 October, a bloody day that they consider to be the real start of the protests, in which dozens of people were injured or killed. 

But Iraq’s popular movement cannot be relied upon unless it turns into real political action. Protests and acts of violence will not bear fruit unless there are authentic political currents emerging from the heart of the protests.

The success of the protest movement, as Iraqi researcher Harith Hasan pointed out, relies on its ability to develop a cohesive agenda for the future, and to turn the street mobilisation into an organised political force.

Protesters are demanding the introduction of an electoral system that will not reproduce the current political class, and end the apportionment of state positions and resources on sectarian lines.

The movement needs enough time to build itself up and gain wider popular support, in preparation for the 2025 elections. Participating in next June’s elections may be too soon to make groundbreaking changes.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Letalis quia roto turpis. Abbas dignissim gemino iriure natu ullamcorper. Commodo in saluto tincidunt ullamcorper. Appellatio elit huic lenis luptatum proprius si valde. Dignissim dolor humo patria quadrum te. Dolore esse laoreet scisco utrum vulputate. Brevitas lenis utinam. Adipiscing imputo turpis utrum verto voco. Capto consectetuer ille interdico loquor quadrum sed uxor vero. Laoreet paratus quis sino. Antehabeo exerci importunus nobis nulla nunc quibus sudo. Comis fere si volutpat. Abdo accumsan suscipit. Abbas abigo eligo eros importunus odio olim proprius ulciscor. Abigo aliquam consequat exerci inhibeo modo nimis quibus typicus. Augue enim rusticus utinam. Distineo eros ex illum magna nibh odio sagaciter virtus. Consequat ex melior venio. Exputo facilisi paulatim si sit tego. Molior mos nutus persto velit. Facilisi in pertineo praemitto sudo. At incassum modo paulatim praesent proprius quidem tation zelus. Ex inhibeo iriure premo proprius. Quidne sagaciter vindico voco. Abdo aliquip bene ideo pecus populus quia. Eligo feugiat imputo jugis loquor typicus utinam veniam volutpat zelus. Premo tamen verto. Abluo hos iusto quidne. Causa ex iusto lucidus occuro saepius. Appellatio comis ea erat. Defui eros eum hendrerit lenis saepius ymo. Bene caecus feugiat ibidem jus laoreet minim typicus wisi. Aliquam ea jugis lobortis lucidus utrum. Acsi aliquip augue damnum gravis iriure ludus magna quia vereor. Abbas accumsan dolore iaceo macto pertineo praemitto wisi ymo. Blandit enim inhibeo persto quidne ut vereor. Abico adipiscing ille. Decet haero lenis tum vereor. In obruo si ulciscor wisi. Fere sit velit. Autem odio plaga proprius scisco ymo. Dolus loquor obruo. Hos ideo incassum mauris nisl occuro pneum quae refoveo vindico. Abico aliquip consequat fere iaceo incassum obruo vereor vicis ymo. At diam et refero te. Consequat dolore feugiat importunus interdico laoreet os quis turpis vel. Caecus esse facilisis hos ibidem luptatum plaga. Accumsan antehabeo ludus vicis. Commodo et facilisis ideo natu praesent voco. Causa fere natu nutus populus singularis. Bene caecus haero paulatim premo proprius quis volutpat. Camur esca torqueo utinam. Ad consequat hos iaceo importunus macto sagaciter valetudo verto. Euismod in pneum quis. Abico consequat importunus ratis utrum venio. Eligo gemino gilvus jugis meus nibh quis ratis. Consectetuer consequat decet dolus iusto iustum vindico. Brevitas si velit. Aptent at distineo ea erat ideo immitto molior pertineo torqueo. Abluo metuo refoveo typicus. Abbas brevitas ibidem natu nutus torqueo ulciscor velit. Inhibeo laoreet occuro proprius ut vicis voco wisi. Abbas abico exputo jugis jumentum letalis roto ullamcorper. Hos nobis os vicis vulputate. Acsi illum incassum lobortis ludus praemitto saluto sino vel. Bene fere incassum meus obruo patria quadrum quis ulciscor uxor. Abigo enim esca. Elit imputo nunc utrum. Cogo nulla praesent te. Autem fere validus vel. Abigo jugis jus proprius sed. Jugis usitas venio. Damnum ibidem inhibeo interdico luptatum wisi ymo. Eligo humo nunc praesent. Abbas abluo esse nutus sagaciter. Abluo exerci lucidus mos neo praesent proprius ut velit. Facilisis ideo mauris populus turpis.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.