Skip to main content

Israel's far-right government removes the mask that enabled western complacency

Maybe the West will have to accept that there is no legal or moral difference between the occupation in Ukraine and the occupation in Palestine
Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israeli far-right leader of the Otzma Yehudit (Jewish power) party, attends a campaign on 6 October, 2022 (AFP)

To the onlooker, Israel is visibly changing. The shift is most conspicuous from the outside: the world sees a western liberal democracy moving with alarming speed towards ultra-nationalism, fundamentalism, racism, fascism and the breakdown of democratic structures as a result of the recent election

While correct, this view is also distorted. It assumes that until now, Israel was indeed a western democracy, and that it is now visibly becoming something else. The truth, however, is less about Israel fundamentally changing, and more about it shedding its masks and disguises. 

The extreme right in Israel is much more extremist than the right in Europe, and perhaps even than in the US

What is changing is the appearance. The cracks appearing in Israel’s image bear little relation to the underlying essence. From this standpoint - and this standpoint only - the new government can be viewed as a harbinger of a positive message: the truth about Israel will come to light, albeit at a heavy cost in terms of the oppression of Palestinians and the rupture of fragile democratic structures that hitherto served Israel’s Jews.

The new government will be the most right-wing and religiously conservative in Israel’s history. The truth, at least in terms of the ideology of most of its ministers, is that it will also be the most extremist government anywhere in the West today. The extreme right in Israel is much more extremist than the right in Europe, and perhaps even than in the US.

It will now rule Israel and control the most senior positions. A government in which Benjamin Netanyahu is the standard-bearer for the secular and liberal is a very extremist government indeed. 

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked


Threats lie in wait from all sides: destruction of the justice system, harm to minorities, a shameless ramping-up of Jewish supremacy, the heavy hand of religion in everyday life, and an occupation ever more cruel to its Palestinian subjects. It is difficult at such an early stage to know which of these will actually come to pass. 

A right-wing activist holds a sign reading “leftists traitors” during a protest by left-wing activists in Jerusalem on 12 December 2022 (AFP)
A right-wing activist holds a sign reading “leftists traitors” during a protest by left-wing activists in Jerusalem on 12 December 2022 (AFP)

Israel has already had right-wing governments and extremist parties whose ascension to power had a moderating effect on their plans, for all kinds of reasons. “Things look different from here than they did from there” is the usually-accepted explanation. But it is certainly within the realm of possibility that Netanyahu’s new partners are made of sterner stuff and will carry out the looming threat of regime change in several areas of crucial significance for Israel.

Hitting the panic button

Faced with a potential actualisation of this extreme scenario, the Israeli left and centre have hit the panic button, notably by embarking on a campaign of attempted intimidation. Not a day passes without another prophecy of doom - and some, if not all, of these predictions will surely be borne out.

Nevertheless, one cannot help but ask: is the threatened change really such a radical one? Was Israel truly such a lone outpost of democratic norms, equality under the law, protection of human rights and sanctity of judicial systems that this new government could enter stage right and destroy it all? 

How Ben-Gvir blows apart the ‘security’ story of Israel’s occupation
Read More »

Was that Israel of the “good old days” - the one before the new government - a country so far removed from fascism, ultra-nationalism and apartheid that the new government can come to power and change everything, so that Israel turns into that kind of country now?

Obviously not. Without downplaying the dangers posed by the new government and its chosen path, one cannot help but notice that the alarmist campaigns in response to its declarations seem to have a covert subtext about how good it was here when the Zionist left and centre were in power; how all of that will come to an end now, and how bad it will all be. That picture, however, is far from accurate.

Consider the 166 Palestinians, including at least 39 children, who died by acts of the Israeli military and settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem since the beginning of this year. An additional 49 Palestinians, including 17 children, who were killed in Gaza during Israel's three-day onslaught in August on the besieged strip. 

Were they killed under the terrifying new government featuring Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, or under the so-called “government of change” featuring the liberal promises of Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz, whose tenure is now ending? 

The difference between regimes will most likely be, first and foremost, one of rhetoric: the centre-left tries to gloss over the facts, whereas the extreme right will hide nothing. In some ways, this may prove advantageous. 

The new government, by word and deed, may force Israel’s allies, along with the almost non-existent leftist camp in Israel, to look honestly at Israel and acknowledge the reality. With a government like the one that’s coming, no longer will there be an option to ignore, avert the gaze and obfuscate, attempting to make do with weak condemnations and clinging to a fictitious “peace process” or a two-state solution that has long been unrealistic. 


The new government will force the West to look at Israel and admit, at least to itself: this is an apartheid state. Continuing the masquerade ball with Israel will become untenable. The new government may even compel Israel’s allies to move one step forward and, for the first time in Israel’s history, take practical actions against it.

Reason for hope

Not all of this may happen. Israel may not radicalise to the extent that some would have us fear; or, despite its radicalisation, the West - especially the US - may go on insisting that rhinestones are diamonds, claiming that Israel is the West’s frontline outpost in the Middle East and insisting that criticism of the state is forbidden because of the Holocaust. 

But there is also another possibility. When Israel legislates appalling ultra-nationalist laws; when house demolitions and expulsions in the occupied West Bank soar; when Israel’s Supreme Court is stripped of all power; when the army kills unimaginable numbers of Palestinians and the annexation of the occupied territories becomes a fact no longer deniable - perhaps then, the West will have no other option than to turn its back on its beloved Israel, world champion of impunity, for whom almost everything is permissible. 

Perhaps then, the West’s position will have to change. Maybe the West will finally understand that there is no legal or moral difference between the occupation in Ukraine and the occupation in Palestine, and that the measures it took immediately against the Russian occupation can finally be considered against the Israeli occupation, after 55 years that only postponed the ultimate outcome?

Israel election: Extreme right in Netanyahu's government won't dent western support
Read More »

It is true that the new government, and especially some of its ministers, may take irreversible steps that could further amplify inequality, oppression, deprivation, discrimination and Jewish supremacy in all areas of life. Also true is that the first to pay the price for all this will be Palestinians in the occupied territories and Palestinian citizens of Israel. Their lives could certainly change, but let us bear in mind that their situation has already been intolerable for decades.

A handful of human rights activists in Israel may also pay a price, along with freedom of expression, which is already facing significant attempts at curtailment. 

In addition, the expected damage to governmental checks and balances could endanger the entire state structure, from a planned “override clause” undermining the power of the Supreme Court in a country without a constitution, to proposed legislation designed to allow convicted criminals to serve in government. Many opinion pieces have already been written to warn against these dangers, which should not be taken lightly. 

Meanwhile, the time has come for Israel to undergo a fundamental shakeup, including in the attitude of its friends in the West. For more than five decades, Israel has claimed that the occupation of 1967 was temporary, and the world bought into that bluff.

The new government will put an end to that. The occupation will be permanent, not temporary, and there will clearly be no intention to ever grant national rights to half the people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. 

This demands an international response; it is not an internal Israeli matter. Anyone who thinks that Israel will ever change course willingly, of its own accord, does not know Israel very well. Israel has no reason and no incentive to do so. The world has thus far accepted Israel with its apartheid and its oppression, while Israel ignores the international community, its institutions and its decisions. 

No other country can thumb its nose at international law as Israel does and not pay a price. But apparently, there is a point at which a critical mass of insolence, arrogance and over-confidence could leave the world no choice but to take action. The hope is that this new government will bring Israel closer to precisely that point - apart from which, few hopes are evident in the vicinity. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.

Letalis quia roto turpis. Abbas dignissim gemino iriure natu ullamcorper. Commodo in saluto tincidunt ullamcorper. Appellatio elit huic lenis luptatum proprius si valde. Dignissim dolor humo patria quadrum te. Dolore esse laoreet scisco utrum vulputate. Brevitas lenis utinam. Adipiscing imputo turpis utrum verto voco. Capto consectetuer ille interdico loquor quadrum sed uxor vero. Laoreet paratus quis sino. Antehabeo exerci importunus nobis nulla nunc quibus sudo. Comis fere si volutpat. Abdo accumsan suscipit. Abbas abigo eligo eros importunus odio olim proprius ulciscor. Abigo aliquam consequat exerci inhibeo modo nimis quibus typicus. Augue enim rusticus utinam. Distineo eros ex illum magna nibh odio sagaciter virtus. Consequat ex melior venio. Exputo facilisi paulatim si sit tego. Molior mos nutus persto velit. Facilisi in pertineo praemitto sudo. At incassum modo paulatim praesent proprius quidem tation zelus. Ex inhibeo iriure premo proprius. Quidne sagaciter vindico voco. Abdo aliquip bene ideo pecus populus quia. Eligo feugiat imputo jugis loquor typicus utinam veniam volutpat zelus. Premo tamen verto. Abluo hos iusto quidne. Causa ex iusto lucidus occuro saepius. Appellatio comis ea erat. Defui eros eum hendrerit lenis saepius ymo. Bene caecus feugiat ibidem jus laoreet minim typicus wisi. Aliquam ea jugis lobortis lucidus utrum. Acsi aliquip augue damnum gravis iriure ludus magna quia vereor. Abbas accumsan dolore iaceo macto pertineo praemitto wisi ymo. Blandit enim inhibeo persto quidne ut vereor. Abico adipiscing ille. Decet haero lenis tum vereor. In obruo si ulciscor wisi. Fere sit velit. Autem odio plaga proprius scisco ymo. Dolus loquor obruo. Hos ideo incassum mauris nisl occuro pneum quae refoveo vindico. Abico aliquip consequat fere iaceo incassum obruo vereor vicis ymo. At diam et refero te. Consequat dolore feugiat importunus interdico laoreet os quis turpis vel. Caecus esse facilisis hos ibidem luptatum plaga. Accumsan antehabeo ludus vicis. Commodo et facilisis ideo natu praesent voco. Causa fere natu nutus populus singularis. Bene caecus haero paulatim premo proprius quis volutpat. Camur esca torqueo utinam. Ad consequat hos iaceo importunus macto sagaciter valetudo verto. Euismod in pneum quis. Abico consequat importunus ratis utrum venio. Eligo gemino gilvus jugis meus nibh quis ratis. Consectetuer consequat decet dolus iusto iustum vindico. Brevitas si velit. Aptent at distineo ea erat ideo immitto molior pertineo torqueo. Abluo metuo refoveo typicus. Abbas brevitas ibidem natu nutus torqueo ulciscor velit. Inhibeo laoreet occuro proprius ut vicis voco wisi. Abbas abico exputo jugis jumentum letalis roto ullamcorper. Hos nobis os vicis vulputate. Acsi illum incassum lobortis ludus praemitto saluto sino vel. Bene fere incassum meus obruo patria quadrum quis ulciscor uxor. Abigo enim esca. Elit imputo nunc utrum. Cogo nulla praesent te. Autem fere validus vel. Abigo jugis jus proprius sed. Jugis usitas venio. Damnum ibidem inhibeo interdico luptatum wisi ymo. Eligo humo nunc praesent. Abbas abluo esse nutus sagaciter. Abluo exerci lucidus mos neo praesent proprius ut velit. Facilisis ideo mauris populus turpis.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.