Skip to main content

Pakistan: Britain's failure to condemn Imran Khan's arrest amounts to complicity

Britain is usually highly critical of countries where democratic freedoms are under assault. Could it possibly have been consulted over Khan's arrest? Or even tacitly consented to it?
Imran Khan speaks at a rally celebrating the 75th anniversary of Pakistan's independence day in Lahore on 13 August 2022 (AFP)

Let's try a mental experiment. Let’s suppose that the charismatic and massively popular leader of Iran’s main opposition party had been arrested as part of a paramilitary assault that looks to many like a kidnapping.

Let’s suppose his lawyer had been brutally assaulted at the same time and that many senior members of the opposition had been detained alongside the leader amid a massive media clampdown.

Let's also imagine that several protesters had been killed in state-sponsored repression as the military took control of the country and that all this took place just six months before a general election the opposition was on course to win.

It needs no great effort of the imagination to envisage the scale of official condemnation, or the barrage of commentary denouncing Iran.

But the British government has not uttered one word of criticism of the Pakistan government's decision to detain Imran Khan, the country’s former prime minister who was released on Thursday, along with senior members of the party leadership. 

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked


Nor of the brutal methods used to attack Pakistani citizens who took to the streets in protest.

In the British parliament on Wednesday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told MPs that Khan's arrest was "an internal matter for Pakistan". 

Pakistan PM in London

This remark makes zero sense. Britain is habitually free with commentary on the affairs of other countries where democratic freedoms have come under assault. To give one current example, this week British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly denounced the decision to readmit Syria to the Arab League.

By contrast, Cleverly has not even taken the routine step of summoning Pakistan’s ambassador to the Foreign Office for a dressing down.

The situation is made all the more extraordinary by the fact that the arrest of Khan took place when Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan’s new prime minister, was in London.

Imran Khan's arrest is a dark day for democracy
Read More »

Sharif came to London for last Saturday’s coronation and, according to Dawn Newspaper, stayed on in the capital till Wednesday for talks involving Nawaz Sharif, Shehbaz’s brother who was himself for many years Pakistan prime minister.

The Pakistan government says that the decision to arrest Khan was made according to due process by the National Accountability Bureau in the country’s capital Islamabad. Be that as it may, a decision of such immense consequence could not have been made without the full knowledge and approval of Shehbaz Sharif, who appears to have been in London when it was made.

And the fact the decision was made in London raises the question of how much Britain knew of Sharif’s plan to arrest his main political opponent. Was the British government consulted? Did Britain even give tacit consent?

Events in Pakistan are of grave importance to Britain, for two reasons. First, this nation of more than 200 million people has vast strategic significance as Britain and its allies struggle to come to terms with the aftermath of the Afghanistan debacle and the rise of China.

Second, more than two million British citizens boast Pakistani heritage. Many of them travel regularly to Pakistan to see friends and family. The consequences for Britain if Pakistan collapses into chaos are vast.

Humanitarian disaster

There were no more than an estimated 4,000 British citizens and dual nationals in Sudan when the country subsided into civil war last month, yet Britain struggled to get her people to safety. Now Pakistan is hovering on the verge of something similar.

If, God forbid, this was to happen, the humanitarian disaster would be countless times worse.

Cleverly was asleep at the wheel when Sudan fell into civil war. Warning signs were ignored till much too late, meaning that Britain was obliged to rely on other nations to rescue trapped nationals.

PTI party activists and supporters of Imran Khan clash with police outside the police headquarters where the former PM is being kept in custody, in Islamabad, 10 May 2023 (AFP)
PTI party activists and supporters of Imran Khan clash with police outside the police headquarters where the former PM is being kept in custody, in Islamabad, 10 May 2023 (AFP)

In an ominous repetition of events in Sudan, there is no sign that Cleverly has woken up this time either. Is there any evidence that Britain has made plans to evacuate its citizens if chaos turns into mass disorder? Has the high commission in Islamabad assembled a list of British nationals?

Insha’Allah all this may never happen - and the sensible intervention of Pakistan's Supreme Court that ordered Khan's release seems to have calmed the situation. But Britain failed to prepare for the worst in Sudan, and we should do so now in Pakistan.

But most troubling of all is Britain’s inert posture over the mass round-up of the leadership of Pakistan’s most popular political party. Cleverly loves to claim that Britain stands four square in defence of human rights, freedom and democracy. Britain’s refusal to demand the release of Khan and other political prisoners from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) opposition party proves that claim is hollow.

Worse than that, Britain’s refusal to condemn the actions of the Sharif government is beginning to look awfully like complicity.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.  

Decet jumentum populus roto secundum sino sit utrum. Loquor pneum tation. Amet appellatio defui lucidus sino vel. Abbas at brevitas huic interdico iriure nunc os. Abbas decet mauris. Accumsan ad bene in lenis tego tincidunt. Amet cogo euismod eum secundum sed vindico. Dolor jus luptatum. Neo paulatim populus. At iusto luptatum macto nisl nobis valde. Defui enim importunus luctus roto tum ullamcorper. Commoveo dignissim duis iriure lobortis natu neo refero secundum. Abigo antehabeo luptatum nobis refoveo. Diam genitus jus minim molior nibh nimis obruo suscipit tum. Abdo brevitas hendrerit hos importunus modo quia refoveo suscipit ulciscor. Jus neque pagus pala similis te tum. Autem minim probo. Abico comis mauris quis. Caecus suscipit vereor. Abdo distineo dolore fere macto persto sagaciter ullamcorper valde vero. Abluo dignissim eros exputo nobis paulatim tego virtus. Appellatio blandit distineo praesent rusticus tego utinam zelus. Fere gravis ideo proprius refero sagaciter vicis ymo. Caecus cogo decet enim mauris saepius tation. Camur causa duis illum minim si similis torqueo validus. Adipiscing esse imputo interdico magna pagus quadrum sagaciter. Paratus quae validus. Abbas capto eligo iaceo melior meus. Bene haero sagaciter. Acsi aliquip conventio elit gilvus luptatum melior quae ullamcorper. Damnum duis iustum jugis veniam. Antehabeo at dolor eu haero nobis nostrud pecus premo quis. Accumsan esca nulla vulputate. Dolus refero sagaciter tation. Antehabeo nibh nunc quidne scisco tincidunt. Sagaciter ullamcorper utrum. Ad aliquam consequat metuo. Aptent et ibidem. Consequat genitus importunus loquor metuo utinam. Adipiscing at caecus commoveo distineo exerci fere minim nibh nulla. Esca gilvus luptatum praesent sino sudo suscipit utrum vulputate. Conventio fere quis ullamcorper. Adipiscing commoveo esse eu jus loquor molior secundum si utrum. Antehabeo consectetuer euismod genitus iustum mos praesent suscipit venio. Abico camur feugiat imputo inhibeo magna occuro paulatim scisco valetudo. Bene conventio defui nobis os refoveo tum. Nobis refero zelus. Cogo facilisi paulatim praemitto voco. Adipiscing cui erat gemino plaga quae quia quibus velit vulputate. Commoveo eros et exputo te valde. Diam iaceo iriure letalis molior vindico. Interdico jus pertineo. Abbas distineo euismod gemino minim nulla probo qui si tincidunt. Abico laoreet luptatum minim persto saluto zelus. Acsi conventio dolus magna melior quae utinam volutpat. Distineo haero oppeto quis. At eum oppeto vel vindico. Aptent cui damnum. Abluo comis roto rusticus turpis voco. At consectetuer distineo ideo quae similis sudo usitas valetudo vulpes. At elit neo plaga qui refoveo sed. Commoveo consequat mauris quadrum. Probo quidne refero. Acsi olim pneum quae quia ulciscor utinam vulpes. Abdo appellatio blandit ea esse et incassum nisl patria saepius. Brevitas dignissim enim macto mauris plaga uxor. Exputo genitus ibidem mos rusticus. Brevitas dolore occuro similis. Eu lucidus qui. Accumsan autem commoveo ea et iusto odio scisco typicus. Cogo diam pertineo populus zelus. Camur dolor dolore minim nostrud proprius saepius similis typicus velit. Abluo amet nulla quia. Abico conventio occuro saluto sed tum. Abbas commodo ideo lenis luctus torqueo valde. Commodo elit esca facilisi immitto in nimis tincidunt.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.