Skip to main content

Good and bad Muslims: New UK report reinforces a false narrative

The independent Bloom review on faith engagement falls short of scrutinising the government's longstanding prejudices against Muslim civic activism
Muslims queue outside Manchester Cathedral in England for an Iftar (breaking fast) event during Ramadan, on 29 March 2023 (Reuters)

In emphasising the dearth of religious literacy in the British government and the public sector, the recently released Bloom review seeks to raise the game when it comes to the state’s engagement with faith. 

The independent review, published last month, challenges the government to take religion seriously by recommending the institution of an Independent Faith Champion to take the lead on consulting fairly with faith groups and establishing oversight. 

The report by faith engagement adviser Colin Bloom expresses concern about poor levels of religious literacy, and this is not misplaced. But his recommendations fall short of scrutinising the government’s longstanding prejudices against Muslim civic activism, and as such, it could serve to entrench the draconian reach of the state in regulating minority faiths and containing dissenting perspectives. 

Setting the tone for the rest of the document, the review’s foreword presents a curiously simplistic typology of three different categories when it comes to faith or belief. Bloom’s “true believers” and “non-believers” are the good guys - “sincere, peaceful and decent”, and thus deserving to be taken seriously by government. 

In contrast, “make-believers” are portrayed as insincere trouble-makers, guided by some form of self-interest and employing subterfuge to unfairly exert their influence - a problem and a threat for government and communities alike. 

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked


This is a judgment on which voices can be regarded as legitimate or representative. The problem with this framing is that it relies on subjective descriptors, which when handed over to government leave their interpretations reliant on specific implied notions of peacefulness, decency and sincerity - namely, ones that comply with the politically charged parameters laid down by the state. 

For a government whose ministers have long been proponents of a hawkish nativism, and indeed continue to champion such agendas, there is little doubt that in today’s highly securitised and xenophobic political climate, critical and dissenting Muslim civic voices will be classified as a threat to peace - as subversive and illegitimate disruptors.

The language of 'peace'

The repeated calls in the review for government to reinforce a distinction between Islam (or “peace-loving Muslims”) and Islamism only underline this reality. It has long been a feature of post-9/11 political discourse that a conditional acceptance of Muslim civic actors is predicated on their being “peaceful”, or unproblematic to the prevailing direction of political travel. 

Thus, the “true” Islam of the majority is peaceful and docile, whereas “activist” Muslims who seek to question political arrangements or to effect change are disruptive, even extremist, Islamists. 

And so, in a by-now-familiar fashion, the language of “peace” is used as a foil for the promotion of quietism towards an aggressive state agenda, where handpicked peaceful (read: compliant) voices are held up as agreeable interlocutors and exemplars, and critical or dissenting ones are excluded and demonised. 

Minority faith communities do not need to be told (again) that their contribution to the country is vital and thus makes them worthy of recognition

Recommendations to extend the reach of the state in a range of civic domains should be considered within this context. Heavier regulation in the name of “safeguarding” by a state that has a track record of suspicion towards Muslims raises concerns. That the focus on safeguarding and greater state regulation appears largely focused on minority faiths only underscores this issue. 

Although there is much talk in the Bloom review of fair engagement with faith groups, it offers little by way of directly assessing who should be included and how this would be decided. 

On the question of state engagement with Muslims, the huge and persistent elephant in the room remains how and why successive Conservative administrations have continued to shut out and actively demonise the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB). 

A tired and lazy justification that has long been recycled relates to the council’s allegedly inadequate condemnation of extremism - a double standard to which other religions are not held. It is laughable to think that such charges continue to be levelled without scrutiny, against a group that has gone to great lengths to chronicle its efforts to condemn terrorism.

Convenient platitudes

In Britain, there is a longstanding, implicit policy of variable engagement between the government and minority faith communal and representative bodies. For years, the annual dinner of the Jewish Community Security Trust has been a regular fixture in the home secretary’s diary; meanwhile, public figures are rebuked for dealing with the MCB.

While some commentary has hailed aspects of the Bloom review as a critical call for action from the government in everyday areas where Muslims experience exclusion and discrimination - for example, on allowing sharia-compliant student loans - these are long-overdue measures that have been repeatedly ignored or shelved.

UK: Why Muslims must rethink the approach to ending Islamophobia
Read More »

And, although necessary, their inclusion could be read by some as barely consolatory, in view of how Muslim public life now stands to be increasingly regulated and restricted by the expanding reach of the state. 

In a similar vein, while anyone familiar with community life in contemporary Britain knows the indispensable roles played by so many people of faith in serving and helping others, minority faith communities do not need to be told (again) that their contribution to the country is vital and appreciated, and that it thus makes them worthy of recognition. 

There is ample appreciation of these facts among Muslim organisations who are rather crying out for better resources, capacity building, and genuinely equitable engagement.

Reassurances that a “vast majority” of British Muslims are viewed as loyal, law-abiding and integral to the nation offer very little, if such reassurances are laced with the conditionality that their politics are unproblematic to the state’s political agenda. 

While these platitudes might have for decades provided convenient and reliable content for official messages put out by politicians on Eid and other formal occasions, British Muslims today are more alert than ever to the hostile civic environment within which they operate - and if the Bloom review is anything to go by, things are only going to get worse. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Decet jumentum populus roto secundum sino sit utrum. Loquor pneum tation. Amet appellatio defui lucidus sino vel. Abbas at brevitas huic interdico iriure nunc os. Abbas decet mauris. Accumsan ad bene in lenis tego tincidunt. Amet cogo euismod eum secundum sed vindico. Dolor jus luptatum. Neo paulatim populus. At iusto luptatum macto nisl nobis valde. Defui enim importunus luctus roto tum ullamcorper. Commoveo dignissim duis iriure lobortis natu neo refero secundum. Abigo antehabeo luptatum nobis refoveo. Diam genitus jus minim molior nibh nimis obruo suscipit tum. Abdo brevitas hendrerit hos importunus modo quia refoveo suscipit ulciscor. Jus neque pagus pala similis te tum. Autem minim probo. Abico comis mauris quis. Caecus suscipit vereor. Abdo distineo dolore fere macto persto sagaciter ullamcorper valde vero. Abluo dignissim eros exputo nobis paulatim tego virtus. Appellatio blandit distineo praesent rusticus tego utinam zelus. Fere gravis ideo proprius refero sagaciter vicis ymo. Caecus cogo decet enim mauris saepius tation. Camur causa duis illum minim si similis torqueo validus. Adipiscing esse imputo interdico magna pagus quadrum sagaciter. Paratus quae validus. Abbas capto eligo iaceo melior meus. Bene haero sagaciter. Acsi aliquip conventio elit gilvus luptatum melior quae ullamcorper. Damnum duis iustum jugis veniam. Antehabeo at dolor eu haero nobis nostrud pecus premo quis. Accumsan esca nulla vulputate. Dolus refero sagaciter tation. Antehabeo nibh nunc quidne scisco tincidunt. Sagaciter ullamcorper utrum. Ad aliquam consequat metuo. Aptent et ibidem. Consequat genitus importunus loquor metuo utinam. Adipiscing at caecus commoveo distineo exerci fere minim nibh nulla. Esca gilvus luptatum praesent sino sudo suscipit utrum vulputate. Conventio fere quis ullamcorper. Adipiscing commoveo esse eu jus loquor molior secundum si utrum. Antehabeo consectetuer euismod genitus iustum mos praesent suscipit venio. Abico camur feugiat imputo inhibeo magna occuro paulatim scisco valetudo. Bene conventio defui nobis os refoveo tum. Nobis refero zelus. Cogo facilisi paulatim praemitto voco. Adipiscing cui erat gemino plaga quae quia quibus velit vulputate. Commoveo eros et exputo te valde. Diam iaceo iriure letalis molior vindico. Interdico jus pertineo. Abbas distineo euismod gemino minim nulla probo qui si tincidunt. Abico laoreet luptatum minim persto saluto zelus. Acsi conventio dolus magna melior quae utinam volutpat. Distineo haero oppeto quis. At eum oppeto vel vindico. Aptent cui damnum. Abluo comis roto rusticus turpis voco. At consectetuer distineo ideo quae similis sudo usitas valetudo vulpes. At elit neo plaga qui refoveo sed. Commoveo consequat mauris quadrum. Probo quidne refero. Acsi olim pneum quae quia ulciscor utinam vulpes. Abdo appellatio blandit ea esse et incassum nisl patria saepius. Brevitas dignissim enim macto mauris plaga uxor. Exputo genitus ibidem mos rusticus. Brevitas dolore occuro similis. Eu lucidus qui. Accumsan autem commoveo ea et iusto odio scisco typicus. Cogo diam pertineo populus zelus. Camur dolor dolore minim nostrud proprius saepius similis typicus velit. Abluo amet nulla quia. Abico conventio occuro saluto sed tum. Abbas commodo ideo lenis luctus torqueo valde. Commodo elit esca facilisi immitto in nimis tincidunt.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.